Victims, Villains,
Compassion, and Anger
by John
Enright, Ph.D.
Its easy to feel compassion for the
victims in a situation and God knows there are plenty of environmental victims around.
Indigenous peoples, forests, the disappearing species, and our children are some of them.
When we see what is being done to them, compassion seems natural. Compassion is not the
same, however, as "feeling sorry for." To feel sorry for something or someone
distances us from them. Compassion unites us with them in oneness.
However, for the perpetrators of these horrors,
for the villains in the story, anger accusation, and vengeful feelings are appropriate and
right. Right? Who wants to be united with them in oneness?
I am going to suggest that as much as possible,
we feel compassion for and united with the apparent villain as well.
The Buddhist Thich Nhat Hanh tells of a
boatload of Vietnamese refugees captured by Thai pirates. A girl, raped by one of the
pirates, committed suicide. If you feel more compassion for the girl than the pirate, says
Thich Nhat Hanh, you dont fully understand what is happening and cannot have an
effect on it.
The "villain" the pirate, the
forest despoiler, the polluter is caught up in a thought system of habit,
insecurity, and perceived need or threat that seems very real and leaves him blind to the
full consequences of what he does, and unaware of alternatives. Given the world as he sees
it, what he has done seems good and right; indeed, justified and inevitable.
Just about everyone in her heart of hearts
believe she is doing right most of the time, and when she knows she isnt, she wants
to, and would but for some consideration that seems overwhelmingly important to her. Many
loggers love the forests more deeply than the city dwellers who attack them. But they fear
change and fear for their children more than they love the spotted owl. We can and
I do -- disagree with them about their behavior, and see them as shortsighted. But
villains? No. Jekyll and Hyde are alive and well in everyone, and which of these
sub-personalities emerges in behavior most often depends in part on how the persons
behavior is seen and reacted to. What you see is largely what you get. If you see and
respond in a hostile manner to the evil Mr. Hyde, youll see more of him. If you stay
focused on Dr. Jekyll, thats who youll see more of.
If we stay in righteous anger, tempting as that
my be and virtuous as it feels, the only way we can get Mr. Hyde to change is to join him
in hatred and use on him force of some kind, physical or moral. Then its the Hyde in
him versus the Hyde in us. If we can possibly hold him in compassion as Dr.
Jekyll,
knowing his intentions are ultimately good, and recognizing the horrible effect on him
of what he does, there may be some chance of his changing.
There are no guarantees that he will change. It
may not be until the very moment of death that he will see fully the horror of what he has
done, and experience repentance metanoia. He may not even then; I dont know,
although I want to believe that he will at some point. But if there is any chance at all
of his changing, it is more likely if we provide a mirror instead of a club. In our
silence, he may hear himself. With no external reproach, his own inner self-reproach may
be audible. Remember the times in your life when you felt driven to do something you knew
was harmful to others, but could see no other way. The Thai pirate and the polluter are
human, too.
Anger polarizes. It drives "the villain" into defending and justifying instead of
seeing his behavior more deeply. If we point the finger and say, "You should feel
guilty!" Mr. Hyde can only leap out to defend and counterattack. There is no way he
then can hear his own inner voice of remorse and repentance. So busy defending himself, he
will have little free attention to re-think (repent) what he has done and thus be able
from inside himself to see the horror he has perpetrated and experience the healing moment
of metanoia.
If, instead of attacking, we can continue to
see him as a fundamentally good but misguided human being, it will be more likely than
that Dr. Jekyll will emerge to listen to his own inner voice. It is from this place that
he could possibly change; that is, he could find and support the good, well-meaning human
within himself, one who is capable of caring for others and the Earth, and would act from
this caring place if only his current insecurity could be assuaged.
To cling to anger reveals our own projected unforgiveness of ourselves. If you cant forgive
him, inevitably you will not be able to forgive yourself. All of us in the United States
have done much damage to the Earth. Not intentionally, not knowingly, yet much damage.
We could easily be accused by almost any Third Worlder of being despoilers of nature,
and mistreaters of Third World people. And the
accusations would be accurate. Jeremy Rifkin says in Biosphere Politics (New York:
Crown Publishers, 1991):
"If we were to stop for a moment and
reflect on the number of creatures and Earths resources and materials we have
expropriated and consumed in our lifetime to perpetuate our existence, we would be
appalled at the carnage and depletion that has been required to secure our existence. The
sense of guilt and indebtedness runs deep in the human psyche and stretches over the
expanse of human experience."
No, we dont personally thrust the Penang
off their land, but we do buy the wood products that encourage the Japanese to evict them.
We dont cut down the rain forest with our own little hatchet, but we eat the beef
for which the forest is cut to make room. We feel innocent, and we are innocent of bad
intention. We are simply living the way we learned from our parents. It seemed to be
working for them and we havent looked up recently to notice that the world is
different and those behaviors are now seriously destructive. Our intentions are innocent;
our actions are not.
When do you find it is easier to change; when
the innocence of your intentions is accepted while your behavior is challenged, or when
you are blamed and attacked and your goodness, small as it is, ignored? People can far
more openly listen to the details of the indictments against them, and see and make
appropriate changes, when the innocence of their intentions is accepted. I submit that
what is so obviously true of us applies equally well to many of the villains we see.
Compassion is not an intellectual
"strategy" to be adopted as a "technique." It is only possible for you
if it is possible. If you can find in yourself the experiences that support this view and
make it possible to see the world this way, give it a try.
"But wait!" you might say. "You
mean, just be a doormat and let these greedy villains get away with murder?" No; in
behavior, dont let them get away with anything. By all means oppose vigorously and
effectively what they do. Just dont attack who they are. Be fully
outraged at the action without converting that anger to the person. Anger =
Outrage + Assumed Intentionality. When you begin to see the essential innocence of the
polluters, you can keep the vital, white-hot energy of impersonal outrage without the
energy loss and distraction or personal anger.
Have I succeeded in holding compassion with
everyone Ive met or heard of? Of course not; Id apply for canonization if so.
However, when Ive been able to hold it, some people have made some remarkable shifts
in attitude and behavior. And I find the internal climate of compassion and forgiveness a
much more pleasant place for me to live.
Channel Surfing
by
Christopher James Collier
Sitting in the comfort of my living room...my eyes
are affixed to a television. It tells me of things that are happening in my town and,
thanks to the glory of cable, a glimpse into the world itself.
Surfing through the number of many electronic
windows I soon come upon a news report. It is on this report that a "perfect"
anchorman with "perfect" teeth reports on a: 1) murder, 2) rape, or 3) robbery.
You can choose any to describe the assault on the person of ___________ (fill in the
blank with any name, for crime seems to touch everyone regardless of race, age or gender).
I, like so many African-Americans, find myself
doing that chant we have done so many times when we have seen such reports.
"Please don't let it be a black
man..."
He continues his report...describing all of the
gruesome details of the crime...
"Please don't let it be a black
man..."
Then comes the payoff...
The "perfect" anchor with
"perfectly" capped teeth says with some irony, "The perpetrator was a young
black male..."
If you listen carefully he seems to take to his
reporting of the crime with some glee...it is sure to be a ratings grabber to hold the
attention of skittish, paranoid news watchers everywhere. I can almost hear them
commenting to the report in the privacy of their living rooms. "God...that poor, poor
____________ (fill in the gender).
"At the hands of those savages..." I
add sarcastically.
Knowing that my prayers have gone unanswered, I
quickly turn the channel, not wanting to hear the rest.
I go channel surfing, trying to escape the
reality that my mind witnessed on the news affiliate...
A video channel...
Some overweight rapper is speaking on the
virtues of "packing gats" and "smoking chronic." Women are dancing
around him in an act of sexual heat. It's like watching some warped mating dance...Cash
flows like water in this video; others that follow...
Flick...the surfing continues...
Another news report...another crime...Another
announcer describes to the viewing public the details of a family shot during an attempted
robbery in their hotel room. The unfeeling eye of the camera shows gruesome pictures of
broken glass, empty shell casings, and crimson stains of blood.
The prayer rockets from my lips again, but the
announcer cuts me off. "Police are currently looking for two black males..."
Back to the music channel...a skinny
bald-headed rapper tells me of Westside "playas" and his love for California.
My mind starts to wonder what makes someone
commit a crime...what forces them to attack without mercy many of their own kind and many
of other colors? Is it the environment? Is the government?
Then I remember the videos...
...the cash...
Hundreds...Thousands...
...the clothes...
Hilfiger...DKNY...Armanii...
...The rappers talking about being Big
Poppa...The Ill Nanna...Escobar... and so many other criminals they make my head swim...
Then it dawns on me...Money is power...it makes
the world go round or as it was said in the 90's "Cash Rules Everything Around
Me."
Flick...
"...Got my mind on my money and my money
on my mind..."
According to some, brothers today have nothing
to look forward to... if you look at television you think that most of us are
predators...hunters...stalkers of men and their families. Of course the facts speak
differently...One out of 4 black men are in jail...yet we never hear about the other 3 men
who are doing something with their lives...
"...If it Don't Make Dollars...It Don't
Make Sense..."
So now you have the paradox...you have a world
that loves money and all the power that it gives (Just ask O.J.) but you have a society
that is at the bottom of the food chain. They wait for trickles of cash to reach them as
if they where fish in a barrel.
C.R.E.A.M....
When money is placed of the hands of the
forgotten it gives them power once undreamed of...Power to fight wrongs...end
poverty...make them men in a society that treats them less as such...Some feel that they
have no choice.
However they are wrong...
Our perception needs an adjustment...
Money does not change the way America looks at
you...unfortunately you go from being a poor "nigger" to a rich one.
Much needs to be done...but that first step to
change the perception against the reality is the first thing. Until our fascination with
the almighty buck is removed from the American Consciousness we as African-Americans will
cringe every time that news report breaks in with a special bulletin.
"Please don't let it be a black
man..."
"Please don't let it be a black
man..."
"Please, God, don't let it be a black
man!!!"
back to top
|